Oct. 30, 2009
The Pinoy’s Pinoy
Digital Illustration by: Partick B. Astilla (http://eagleeatingmonkey.carbonmade.com/)
Comments

The Pinoy’s Pinoy

Digital Illustration by: Partick B. Astilla (http://eagleeatingmonkey.carbonmade.com/)

Comments

Oct. 30, 2009

The Pinoy’s Pinoy

That it shows when national identity’s structure is a facsimile of the colloquial phrase ‘the man’s man’, the Filipino is not without his attendant Filipino.

For men, the guy they can openly praise is a close shave against their taut egos and yet they do and easily so because he isn’t just okay by their standards, he is it. In essence he is both one and all of them at any given moment—perfected; escaping elusively, not at all like a single one of them. The structure works this way: X’s X is a person apotheosized by his kind.

And the search boils down to the Pinoy’s Pinoy. The national, the true Filipino, is packaged in such a manner. You need only to look at today’s credit card and membership promotions, the yellow plated vehicles, and the hip new pair of lenses flashing ‘round the metro. Demythologizing the Pinoy’s Pinoy, extracting his existence in any one of us, in all of us, is a method that I would like to try in deconstructing the thousands of years of history, popularized today (see team Manila, etc.) and simultaneously threatened in present’s milieu by globalization and damningly, maybe, define for myself, place you in a position to consider this on your own, what the Filipino is— the question ‘what does it mean to be Filipino’ that until now seems to state a condition and for a specific number you traits you are a certain percentage Filipino.

From somewhere near, sometime recent, reorientation with culture for identity’s sake has sprung talent and influence into the palatable and trendy education of the masses. Movements, consumer products, arts and banners, stenciled heroes are the reformulated subjects out on the streets. We’ve pegged our identity to a lot of variables through the course of our history; persons, events equally the result of deliberation and miscalculation, have served, separately, well to assuage an identity crisis but when comes the point to look at the cohesive picture the cracks seems to stand out against the relief of everything we’ve previously came to identify with.

And now the question itself puts on images and falls in line the visual, commercial, revolution. We’d be foolish to take the shirt where emblazoned our unique geography as the answer to the question of identity itself. Wearing pins, bags, posting stickers and posters on our spatial and material extensions (bedrooms and laptops) are much less answers and yet, more than raiment and status symbol. I believe they have been designed to propel and have opened through more interesting, accessible and aesthetically pleasing portals the critique and question of identity.

When we don such a shirt it comes to pass that you face and have others face the question. The question not of our own conception, not simply the articulations of the starving and confused soul, is now finally understood to come from the outside, a separate entity. His neighbor walking along a pedestrian crossing might awaken a person in stupor. Just like that, this brother of yours has challenged you. He seems to be that entity at that very moment. You have to ask him back:

Is that what it means to be Filipino? Is it he?

You need only to be familiar with the campaign ‘I am Ninoy’ to see how its parallelism to this line of thought—consolidating the general population by the man himself. This is a good campaign; insightful and inventive enough except the construction of such an epitome like Ninoy fails by too much definition of one person who is lost, has escaped in the very asking who is Ninoy? There is too much construction around a person, too much life to speak of to catch by such a catch phrase. This metaphysical argument set aside, bias, sensation, character speculation will get in the way. More, the Filipino as they appear in census is too diverse to rally behind a Catholic, city-bred, upperclassman. Idols and heroes work well for the living; in this way we remain in the same plane, but these people are men and what I am trying to get at, the Filipino, is not a man per se, is human, but not made flesh (not yet, or the my attempt would already be moot).

Their characteristics, say love of country over self might be more effective without the attendant personality.  The name of such a historical figure, has its traps strewn and tangled in the green. There is all the merit to gain in a canon of heroes for a nation but when trying to define the Filipino, one person can do more to sully and shroud the conception than a host of heroes can do well for it.

To be sure, I do believe that there is one binding thing, present for every Filipino.

For a long time now, as many the most who was ever concerned, sought beyond the trappings of cultural diversity following only that dull ache, through a history continued to be colonized by the lack of our own written literature, we pursue the dark halls unable to accept that that the history, not of our own choosing is the core of identity. Hear yourselves, those of you who propose this?

What does it mean be Filipino?

To have been colonized half a century [—whose culture is the result of it].

Cry foul men before the white. I do not ignore any facts, the history of school, they are true. I am writing in English; my neighbor’s eyes are a thin line like twilight’s horizon; most I know say bintana vs. durungawan; I am in fact Catholic. Filipinos are the appropriators of the centuries and cultures behind them. But are Filipinos Indians, Mexicans? That dull ache still echoes further down history.

Advertisements claim to hold a mirror to your person every time you see the mock-up of a credit, membership, or discount card. By naming you, by naming us collectively, they seem to make another proposition on yours and my identity.

‘Is that really me?’, I ask. My discomfort and unrest seems to be speaking out.

Plainspoken in innocence, unassuming thereby affable, here is Juan. J. dela Cruz, the proverbial Filipino, yes. Without a doubt, he does exist. He is characteristically the poster-boy of the overlooked. In my search for national quintessence, I have to bypass him all the same because he just does not do it for me; he isn’t my kind of Filipino. He assumes the average Filipino who lives on the fringes. The average-majority or the general is the one with less than $2/day, a statistical number to whose subject (when applied a value-judgment upon: good-bad) it is always indirectly proportional (literacy-low; corruption-high). I would like more out of my guy; I have a right to this, I say. Zarathustra, essentially an Übermensch, man of the Arian race compared to J. dela Cruz?

But none of it is the matter; Ninoy or Rizal’s preemptive deaths and shortcomings have nothing do with why they aren’t the answers to our question of national identity. And while I feel that J. dela Cruz needs a new name (personally, I like Protacio), much more a new job, a different set of goals, and a little more testosterone while still keeping his poetic stance, J. dela Cruz will still be on the same plane of being as Juan Tamad, who as a parody of the Spanish creatio will be still be a burlesque show only that he is our own. Isn’t the victim and poverty when poeticized like this but a lugubrious sideshow still to the colonial grand act? It’s as if because we can’t reverse the deplorable, we romanticize the state and lose our souls finally making everyone of us laughable cynics.

Proverbial, heroic, figurative, these are only and of course, all structures and glaring signs of that search. Possibly those who’ve created them realize just as I do that there isn’t a concept or trait, myth or biography to wholly encompass the expansive geography and extensive diversity of the reality of the Filipino. Because that’s just it, the condition is given but at once; instantaneously it is irrevocable. By the fact that I am Filipino, I’ve eliminated all. You were born Filipino and that’s it. Still, he isn’t man, only human.

At this point the Filipino is but an abstraction, a potential in every one of the population. An actuality only in relation to the next guy: being Filipino. The sentiment of nationality and nationalism is implicitly collective, an idea that exists for a collective because of a collective.

One isn’t a certain nationality but of a certain nationality. Beginning from the plural, from the number two is there a Filipino. Every day, without so much as a word, any and every person you encounter is asking you to lay claim on the your identity and on our national identity.  You are in as much as your neighbor is begotten by you.

So it was said that unification was impossible with all the diversity present as if it was dependent on the magic man, first brown-skinned Adam with the trait (genetic, cultural, a chromosome, his rib?) that the German, Spanish or French didn’t have. When truly anything of substance, change, and importance is dependent on unification—our most honest response to the fact of the matter that we were born of no other people but these men who immediately surround us. National identity will continue to be renewed in every relation, in every two people. This active, dynamic quality is what seems to keep eluding us every time. Because it is happening and will continue to happen for as long as we keep at it, it shall continue to be a challenge demanding to be met. And every answer is a call in itself because we have again altered and added to our national identity.

Relations can never be satiated and we will always face the question of national identity. The very first Filipinos knew this by heart thus the value bayanihan. It asks us to raise our brothers, a much deeper and far reaching kind of apotheosis.

by: Louise Albano

Comments

Oct. 26, 2009
Why shouldn’t we be passionate about what is OURS? And who better to inspire passion for this Nation than the artists?
Oct. 26, 2009

The OPF Official Website

Oct. 26, 2009

The Big & Small of Us

By: Atty. Jess Manalo

In my practice, I have gravitated toward a growing number of people who believe that there is hope for the nation. I have seen that more and more people clamor for a different perspective, for the shifting of paradigms. People want to see things to love about their country, want to experience rebirth, reigniting of our passion as a nation. These epiphanies and encounters have led to the unfolding of The Outlooke Pointe Foundation.

The writer Conrado de Quiros once said that the biggest problems of this nation springs from its lack of nationhood. Our vision, Liyab Pilipinas: Reigniting passion for the Nation is a vision that breaks down a lofty aspiration into smaller, doable projects that inspire, spark and reawaken nationhood in our fellowmen.

After concluding our photography contest, Moving Stills| The Dignity of the Filipino Worker, we realized that our youth is more willing to be involved than we give them credit for. The five hundred entries that literally gushed in spoke volumes about how proactive and aware they really were—willing to give our workers a worthy second look, capturing their dignity with the click of a shutter. The entries blew us away, the wide spectrum of workers showcased and the obvious passion with which the photos were taken.

We have wrapped up more initiatives, to name a few: Moving Stills | In their shoes: a photo essay on our policemen, taken by our winners of the photo contest, Sinugdanan, a groundbreaking artists’ summit in Bohol where 9 artists  converged and created pieces on passion for the nation. We also look forward to the conclusion of projects we are currently working on such as  Sampalataya, a summit held in Tagaytay where they created pieces on Filipino faith, which will be exhibited in Shangri-la Plaza; and a storybook writing competition called Sagip, on Saving Our Seas.

In tandem with our website, www.theopf.org, we decided to come up with an online journal to chronicle our quest to reignite passion for this remarkable nation.  You will read our philosophies, the WHYs behind WHAT we do, as this truly is what fuels all our endeavors.  We encourage you to explore this journal, spread the word, and join us in our work of reminding our fellowmen what an awesome country our motherland really is.

The work will never really end, the need to inspire, spark and reawaken remains. The ideals, however, and our desire to make a dent burn even stronger.

Comments

  Liyab Journal  
about
A project with deadlines that do not end: LIYAB Journal.

In the line-up amongst the Artists' Summit and Moving Stills, LIYAB Journal is another project of ours whose deadline YOU determine.

For passion's sake! To reignite passion for the nation, we chose weapons, aligned our methods in the which is passion itself: art. Mitigating the abstract, LIYAB Journal, should try, with words, 'sense-making' of the experience, the movement, the feeling, art, life! Sense-making, that is, passion moved toward action, habits, manners, etiquette, policy-making, revolutions! LIYAB Journal is busy in the process of sense-making and chronicling those busying themselves with it too.

We are looking for DISTINCTLY FILIPINO THOUGHT. How old is the Filipino? Since his birth the efforts to write down his passion were undertaken by but a few knowing the resilience of passion is not without support. Transcribing, chronicling, exploring and creating though anew--these channels of support stoke the flame and the Filipino; he is brought back to life! Trust that we might be making up word an phrases that between Filipinos an entire reality and understanding lies; know that in every feature you're closer to home.


Now, this business of deadlines' absences:

a. makes the LIYAB Journal the longest running project of the OPF

b. leaves every one of us arbiter of the claim we've done our work for the Filipino

c. invites contribution and following by articles, works of art and photography
(email us at the info@theopf.org)


LIYAB PILIPINAS!
following
Tumblr Staff
design
platform